Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Graphically solving haversine calculation
    From: Jaap vd Heide
    Date: 2015 Nov 12, 06:42 -0800


    I have expanded the azimuth part of the graphical sight reduction I proposed and have taken a look at the LD info you attached.

    I do also think I have to make a remark about precision of the graphical method I propose though. Bacause while acurate, the method I propose lacks the precision I that would think is necessary for it to be of real practical use when it comes to positioning. I haven't done real testing yet, but I wouldn't be surprised to find a spread with a standard deviation of 1°, which means an intercept having a 95% confidence interval of +/- 120 nautical miles.
    (testing on the beach nearby, on the West coast of the Netherlands, could then put me either well into Germany or somewhere on the East coast of the United Kingdom)
    With clearing a Lunar Distance such differences make up an uncertainty of hours.
    For reducing a sight for getting an azimuth, a precision as mentioned would probably be sufficient to check the boat's compas, which is the kind of use I have in mind, besides it just being fun.



    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site