Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Position-Finding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
    Re: Global oceanic tides,
    From: Trevor Kenchington
    Date: 2003 Aug 25, 00:28 -0300

    Geoffrey Butt wrote:
    
    >  So, right or wrong, this is the
    >  way I explain two tides per day:
    >
    >  * The Moon and Earth rotate around each other in the manner of a hammer-
    >    thrower before releasing the hammer
    >  * They both rotate about a point close to the surface of the Earth
    >  * The oceans are not rigidly connected to the Earth and are free to respond
    >    to the Moon's gravitational attraction by flowing towards the Moon
    >  * However if, with his second pair of hands, the hammer thrower was carrying
    >    a bowl of water as he rotated his eccentric motion would cause the water
    >    in the bowl to slosh outwards, away from the hammer
    >  * On the side of the Earth closest to the Moon the effect of Moon's gravity
    >    exceeds the sloshing effect and water levels are raised there - towards
    >    the Moon
    >  * On the side of the Earth remote from the Moon the sloshing effect exceeds
    >    the gravity effect and water levels are raised there also - away from the
    >    Moon
    >  * .. so there are two raised ocean levels opposite one another and as the
    >    Earth rotates beneath one experiences locally two tides per day
    
    
    All of which is correct, as far as it goes into detail, save for the
    very last part: As I wrote earlier today, these two "raised" areas do
    not really exist. They are a very useful model for explaining the
    effects of tide generating forces, which is why Newton came up with the
    idea, but even Medieval knowledge of the tides of the English Channel
    was sufficient to prove to any thinking person that there is not some
    bulge moving westwards down channel at 15 degrees of longitude per hour.
    
    >  I haven't done the calculations myself but have read (somewhere) that the
    >  two causes for ocean raising have slightly different magnitudes - which
    >  explains why plotting sequential tidal ranges from tide tables results in
    >  the 'odd' tides following a slightly different curve from that for the 'even'
    >  tides.
    
    
    That, in contrast, is false. In Newtonian theory the two bulges are of
    exactly equal magnitude -- as is actually true of the tide generating
    forces.
    
    The Newtonian explanation for the diurnal tides (which in most areas
    appear only as the diurnal inequality between the heights of successive
    semi-diurnal high waters and ditto for low waters) is that the Moon (and
    the Sun) rarely have zero declination. When the Moon has a northern
    declination, for example, the "bulge" under the Moon will lie north of
    the Equator, while the antipodean "bulge" will lie at some southern
    latitude. Now imagine an observer at any temperate northern latitude.
    When the Moon passes his meridian, the observer will be quite close to
    the "bulge" and so will experience most of its height. When the Moon
    passes a meridian 180 degrees away, the observer will again experience
    high tide but the peak of the "bulge" will be far to his southward so
    his water level won't rise as high as it did 12 hours (and about 25
    minutes) earlier. The difference in height of the two high waters is the
    diurnal inequality and is the result of superimposing the diurnal tide
    on the semi-diurnal.
    
    Again: These "bulges" don't exist but the forces that try to raise them
    do and the magnitude of those forces varies with the same pattern as
    Newtonian theory pretends that the "bulges" vary.
    
    
    
    >  " I understand that the Manual was produced at short notice in the early days
    >  " of the 1939-45 war to meet the sudden need to train up thousands of
    >  " officer-recruits for the Royal Navy. It's good to see it still being taken
    >  " as a reference.
    >
    >  For this kind of project it is a wonderfully complete resource. However the
    >  mind boggles at the notion of 'thousands of officer-recruits' struggling
    >  with the chapters on the theory of harmonic analysis!
    
    
    I agree. I had never heard that account of the origins of the Manual of
    Tides before George posted it and I don't think that it is stated in the
    preface to my copy, which details the development of the book. Still, I
    don't doubt Georges' tale. I just rather suspect that the Liverpool
    Tidal Observatory was asked for a textbook suited to officer-recruits
    and, like too many scientists, they wrote the text that seemed, to them,
    to convey the minimum amount of knowledge that an officer needed, even
    though it far exceeded what almost any serving officer would have said
    was required. (Here I must plead guilty: My own teaching, including
    lectures on tidal phenomena, repeatedly falls into that mistake.)
    
    I can confirm that, as an undergraduate oceanography student in the
    1970s, we were pointed to the Manual as an ultimate reference on tides
    but we were certainly not expected to master its content. I find it hard
    to think that junior officers, even those with full peacetime training
    at BRNC Dartmouth, were required to know more of the mathematics of
    tides than oceanography students were.
    
    
    
    Trevor Kenchington
    
    
    
    --
    Trevor J. Kenchington PhD                         Gadus{at}iStar.ca
    Gadus Associates,                                 Office(902) 889-9250
    R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour,                     Fax   (902) 889-9251
    Nova Scotia  B0J 2L0, CANADA                      Home  (902) 889-3555
    
                         Science Serving the Fisheries
                          http://home.istar.ca/~gadus
    
    
    

    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site