NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: George, is there a Part 4c?
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2004 Sep 25, 22:46 EDT
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2004 Sep 25, 22:46 EDT
Of George H's 4-part posting on lunars, Arthur Pearson wrote:
"Taken together, they are the original and still the best overall discussion of the lunar distance method."
Taken separately, they are better. Parts one and two are very good!
Parts three and four are not in the same category.
And Arthur should list his own article on "backyard lunars" . It's a great introduction.
Frank R
[ ] Mystic, Connecticut
[X] Chicago, Illinois
"Taken together, they are the original and still the best overall discussion of the lunar distance method."
Taken separately, they are better. Parts one and two are very good!
Parts three and four are not in the same category.
And Arthur should list his own article on "backyard lunars" . It's a great introduction.
Frank R
[ ] Mystic, Connecticut
[X] Chicago, Illinois
