Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Gary LaPook's Digital Watch Experiment
    From: Zvi Doron
    Date: 2012 Feb 29, 19:21 -0000

    Hi Alan and thanks for your reply. Great customer service from Casio.
    
    As your watch has the "Atomic" feature, basically a regular radio update
    from a very precise time source, it is to be expected that it would keep
    precise time - as long as it is within radio reception range of the time
    signal of course.
    
    I am more interested in the accuracy of quartz watches that do not have this
    feature and are left on their own to gain or lose time - hopefully at a very
    slow, constant and predictable rate which would turn them into
    mini-chronometers usable anywhere in the world, radio reception or not.
    
    I have actually just ordered such a watch - or so I hope - also a Casio
    G-Shock, model DW5600E-V1, which is probably the simplest G-Shock available.
    I am assured of its sturdiness - there are wonderful videos on YouTube of
    the thing being taken out of the freezer, tied to a rotating hand drill to
    be slapped repeatedly on a wooden board before being dropped into a boiling
    pot of water for 30 seconds. It still worked after that. I am more curious
    about its accuracy and predictability and that will take some time to test
    and tell. I have a feeling it will not be much better than the little old
    strapless 1984 Casio I already have.
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Alan S
    Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 6:58 PM
    To: zvidoron@btinternet.com
    Subject: [NavList] Re: Gary LaPook's Digital Watch Experiment
    
    Zvi Doron:
    
    On the subject of watch accuracy, I believe I had mentioned this previously,
    but for whatever it might be worth, my experience with the Casio G Shock
    "Atomic Watch" runs as follows. I'm on the second such watch, sent the first
    one back when the resin/plastic band failed after about 5 years of daily
    wearing. From conversation I had had with Casio, I expected return of my old
    watch, with a new band. They sent me an entirely new watch, and helped me
    set it up, as the original one had been.
    
    Respecting each of these watches, checking them against NIST/Naval
    Observatory Time on my computer or at the local public library, I can detect
    no discrepancy between time shown on the Casio and that obtained from  NIST
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    
    : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=118217
    
    
    
    
    -----
    No virus found in this message.
    Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
    Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4842 - Release Date: 02/29/12
    
    
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site