NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: GPS shortcomings.
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2005 Jun 8, 22:05 -0700
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2005 Jun 8, 22:05 -0700
Peter Fogg wrote: >>On Behalf Of Lu Abel >> >>We're talking about the sextant being a backup navigation instrument, >>not the primary one, so I must ask why you think a Davis Mk 15 or Mk 25 >>wouldn't be up to the task. > > > Metal is more reliable. Won't warp and is less liable to temperature > effects. Nothing new or controversial here. Do you speak from experience or just theory about "plastic?" My understanding is that Davis's are made out of a form of "engineered" plastic that is very strong and has virtually no temperature coefficient of expansion. I'll agree "metal is more reliable," but by how much? I have co-taught USPS's celestial courses for many years and about 90% of our students have used Davis sextants. In years of checking sights I've never run across one that was off because the sextant was off -- any errors have always been traced to student error. My own Davis Mark 15 is almost two decades old and has never given me a problem. Lu Abel