Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: GPS backup/emergency navigation
    From: Rick Emerson
    Date: 1998 Nov 25, 7:12 AM

    A friend wrote the following comments in response to a discussion
    about the need for sight reductions with the Nautical Almanac and
    sight reduction tables of some sort (e.g., HO 249) versus doing the
    reductions by solving the navigation triangle "by hand".
    
    [...]
     > No you don't, i.e. need an almanac or HO 249.  Well, you need an almanac,
     > but the perenial one in Bowditch that's about 3 or 4 pages long will
     > suffice for the sun and stars.  It's based on the fact that the almanac
     > nearly repeats every 4 yrs. and a fudge factor is added.   A few basic trig
     > formulas and you don't need 249.  So, volume is minimal and nothing goes
     > out of date.  So, it's perfect for the lifeboat, as long as you practice
     > with it occasionally.  The Celesticomp or just a programmable scientific
     > calculator will certainly make things easier, but I'd like to be dependant
     > on no technology except the watch and the sextant.  Yes the time factor is
     > in your favor.
     >
     > When I find time, I'd like to try working the same sights several ways:
     >
     > 1)  With yearly almanac and HO 249
     > 2)  Perennial almanac and 249
     > 3)  Per. alm. and calculator for direct sight reduction.
     > 4)  Per. alm. and trig. tables and figure by hand.
     > 5)  Per. alm. and abbreviated trig. tables, e.g. sine and cosine just for
     > whole degrees, and then extrapolate in between as needed.
     >
     > I figure that if the error is less than 5 miles, it's adequate for backup
     > navigation.  And satisfying in it's KISS philosophy, i.e. doing the most
     > with the least.
    [...]
    
    As I told Mark, I can try to check the assumption by reducing fixes
    with data 4 years from the correct date but if anyone has done
    research on the techniques listed above, we'd like to know about
    quantitative results.  No point in re-inventing or re-examining the
    wheel!
    
    Rick
    S/V One With The Wind, Baba 35
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=
    =-=  TO UNSUBSCRIBE, send this message to majordomo{at}roninhouse.com:     =-=
    =-=      unsubscribe navigation                                         =-=
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site