Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: GPS Interference
    From: Greg R_
    Date: 2011 Sep 17, 10:01 -0700
    Gary:
     
    I highly respect your abilities as a navigator, but you really lose a lot of credibility when you cite a known propaganda machine like FoxNews as a credible news source. 

    Here's a more balanced view of the topic, on a website from someone who used to be part of that right-wing propaganda machine:


    --
    GregR


    --- On Fri, 9/16/11, Gary LaPook <glapook---.net> wrote:

    From: Gary LaPook <glapook---.net>
    Subject: [NavList] Re: GPS Interference
    To: NavList@fer3.com
    Date: Friday, September 16, 2011, 10:27 PM

    Fox News was all over the story that the administration tried to get General Shelton to change his congressional testimony to favor  Lightsquared, apparently owned by large campaign contributors.

    gl

    --- On Fri, 9/16/11, Richard B. Langley <lang---.ca> wrote:

    From: Richard B. Langley <lang---.ca>
    Subject: [NavList] Re: GPS Interference
    To: NavList@fer3.com
    Date: Friday, September 16, 2011, 5:39 AM

    “Based on the test results and analysis to date, the LightSquared network would effectively jam vital GPS receivers,” General William L. Shelton, commander of U.S. Air Force Space Command, told the members of the House Subcommittee on Strategic Forces [yesterday]. “And to our knowledge thus far, there are no mitigation options that would be effective in eliminating interference to essential GPS services in the United States.”

    More: http://www.insidegnss.com/node/2779

    -- Richard Langley


    On 16-Sep-11, at 1:47 AM, Frank Reed wrote:

    > Gary,
    >
    > There is still a fair amount of controversy over the technical aspects here as well as the bureaucratic machinations at the FCC and elsewhere. I don't think there's any evidence that the Obama Administration cheated or engaged in corruption, but they do consider national wireless broadband a major policy objective so they have asked the FCC to fast-track the approvals process. The LightSquared system uses frequencies which are outside but adjacent to the GPS signal band. The exceedingly weak GPS satellite signals are susceptible to the slightest overlap from the "tails" of other signals. LightSquared claimed a couple of months ago in their report that the vast majority of GPS receivers including, according to them, one-hundred percent of the GPS circuitry in smartphones (by far the largest commercial users of GPS) are not affected by this interference. They also claim that very cheap filtering circuitry could have made all GPS hardware immune to this interference if it had been designed and built according to specs. That latter claim is nice in theory, but seems rather weak in practice. Then again, if they're right, then the makers of those devices should perhaps have to pay to retrofit or replace them any which depended on empty spectrum outside the standard GPS range.
    >
    > It is worth noting that LightSquared received licensing to use that spectrum adjacent to the GPS band in 2004. Note the year. That's smack in the middle of the Bush Administration, not the Obama Administration. This tends to dilute the argument that there is some sort of political corruption at work here. Of course, their plans are a work in progress, and the usages envisioned in 2004 are very different from the current plans. There have been many modifications to the licensing in the past two years. Those can legitimately be questioned for political influence.
    >
    > Incidentally, the primary interference concern at this point apparently applies almost exclusively to high-precision GPS which yields positions accurate to some few centimeters.
    >
    > -FER
    >
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    > Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    > To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    >

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Richard B. Langley                            E-mail: lang---.ca         |
    | Geodetic Research Laboratory                  Web: http://www.unb.ca/GGE/ |
    | Dept. of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering    Phone:    +1 506 453-5142   |
    | University of New Brunswick                   Fax:      +1 506 453-4943   |
    | Fredericton, N.B., Canada  E3B 5A3                                        |
    |        Fredericton?  Where's that?  See: http://www.fredericton.ca/       |
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------




       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site