Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Fw: Re: shortest twilight problem...
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2010 Jun 29, 16:33 +0100

    Well, it seems that this response to an apparently simple question from 
    Joel Silverberg has become a somewhat inglorious eoisode in the history of 
    Navlist.
    
    I started off the rot by writing solstices, when I meant to say equinoxes. 
    Then Marcel seems to have made a double error, which happened to cancel 
    out, and got the right answer for the wrong reasons.
    
    =======================
    
    The story so far.
    
    The situation so far is that we seem to agree that there is a maximum in 
    the length of twilight at each solstice, and a minimum near each equinox.
    
    But note that now I say near each equinox, not at each equinox, because my 
    view has now changed significantly. Rather belatedly, I realise that the 
    question of shortest twilight, that Joel posed, is not so trivial after 
    all. I now think that all told, we (or at least, I) have been jumping to 
    confusions.
    
    It's true that there's a maximum twilight length around each solstice, 
    which is defined simply by symmetry. (Here, I'm neglecting effects caused 
    by the eccenticity of the Earth's orbit, which perhaps shouldn't be 
    neglected). But those maxima are very different in twilight length, between 
    Summer and Winter solstice, as Marcel's graph shows. And that asymmetry, 
    between Summer and Winter, affects the symmetry of the minimum, around the 
    equinoxes, as is also shown in Marcel's plot.
    
    My initial response, that the matter was a trivial one, was based on my 
    understanding that the rate-of-fall of the Sun as it crosses the horizon is 
    greatest at the equinox: as indeed it is. But Joel's question was about the 
    time taken for its altitude to fall from 0º to -18º, which is not 
    symmetrical about the horizon line. If we had been asked about the time for 
    the altitude to fall from +1º to -1º, or even from +18º to -18º, we could 
    confidently say that those intervals would minimise at the equinox. Not so, 
    however, between 0º and -18º
    
    If you look carefully at Marcel's plot, which I recopy here, you will see 
    that the dates of the mimima are indeed shifted from the dates of the 
    equinoxes. Which makes Joel's question a lot more entertaining. Our answers 
    have fallen short.
    
    George.
    
    contact George Huxtable, at  george@hux.me.uk
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. 
    
    
    
    
    

    File:


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site