Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Freiberger Trommelsextant errors
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2012 Apr 18, 17:56 -0400

    Wolfgang,
    I am interested in seeing the raw data of the observations of Mars you
    mention, if it is not too much trouble to tipe them:-)
    
    > Just another cumbersome
    > correction in the sight reduction.
    
    It is not so sumbersome indeed:-)
    Just glue the correction table to your sextant box,
    and add to each observation together with Index correction.
    
    > however frequently use an artificial mirror horizon.
    
    Self-made or Freiberger (or else)?
    
    > I made a sine approximation of the error curve and
    > calculated a correction table in 5? increments in
    > decimal minutes, to simplify handling.
    
    I do not see how sine (or any other) apprixomation simlifies handling.
    All you have to do is to add some number of minutes to each observation,
    which can be easily done mentally.
    What is the difference between adding a true number or an approximation?
    
    > A couple of weeks ago I took a series of observations
    > of Mars with the Freiberger and with my SNO-T. About
    > 10 shots each, changing instruments after every
    > observation.
    
    Why did you switch the instrument fater every observation?
    (To my understanding a natiral thing to do is
    to observe the whole series with one instrument, and
    then with another).
    
    > Any
    > deviations at random, normal observation inaccuracy.
    
    Yes, I would like to see these deviations.
    Or the row data and corrections you applied.
    
    > I just wonder why Freiberger is not consistently
    > producing "good" instruments, given the long
    > experience and likely high quality machinery they are
    > using.
    
    I don't know. The high quality machinery can be worn out.
    I can also imagine economic reasons.
    The sextant is probably tested once, after it is made and assembled.
    Suppose that 10% have errors of the order 1' while the rest
    goal is  < 20".
    (This must be something like  a normal distribution after all:-)
    
    What would you do in such cituation?
    Throw these 10% or 20% away?
    Of course a sensible solution would be to give them some ratings.
    Say, classes A and B, as the British did.
    But this is not really necessary as soon as a certificate showing errors
    is attached.
    
    Alex.
    
    
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site