NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Flinders' Survey of Australia.
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2008 Mar 12, 19:25 -0400
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2008 Mar 12, 19:25 -0400
Peter, you wrote: "This is something that I have heard/read again and again although that, of course, does not make it true. It certainly sounds unlikely, particularly to anyone from long-established and well-mapped places. My understanding is that this applies particularly to parts of the north west (the 'top end' of the state of Western Australia) coast that have always been and remain particularly isolated and barely inhabited. As well, the coast is a complicated one with many off-shore islands and reefs, plus the tidal range is comparatively great. So all in all a good place to avoid." Yes, I can imagine. It would not surprise me at all if Flinders' positions were still the best available, let's say, fifty years ago. But I would bet they've been superceded. Similarly, there were some positions measured by Cook in the South Pacific that were the best available until some time in the middle of the 20th century. I can imagine one possible exception: soundings. There's no real replacement for direct depth soundings, and it's very possible that there are some from the 18th/early 19th centuries still present on Australian charts today. And: "Did I mention the crocodiles? " LOL. No. But I bet they're friendly and cute. -FER --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---