Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Flight 370
    From: Hewitt Schlereth
    Date: 2014 Mar 24, 11:29 -0700
    You know, with a range of 3500+ miles, there are a lot of places the plane could have reached - Yemen, Somalia, Mongolia, North Korea (sayonara, Kim-un), Brisbane ..  another 1000 miles beyond where the search is going on.

    On Mar 24, 2014, at 10:46 AM, "Frank Reed" <FrankReed{at}HistoricalAtlas.com> wrote:


    Rommel, you wrote:
    "My big question is that few people have brought up the possibility of Woods Hole going over to help look for the lost airliner."

    Short answer: It's too early for that, and it's a helluva long trip.

    Right now the focus is on locating anything on the surface. And there really should be tons of small debris. Unless, the pilot deliberately ditched or perhaps the plane was flown to an automated "landing" on the ocean surface, it would have broken up and released a great quantity of small floating debris as well as larger floating pieces.

    Also, just consider the transit time. This Indian Ocean location is very nearly at the antipodes from Woods Hole. That's 180° away measured from the Earth's center, and each degree corresponds to 60 nautical miles so 10,800 nautical miles even if you could travel on a great circle the whole way. More realistically, let's figure 12,000 nautical miles. Suppose they travel at 12 knots for the entire journey. That's over FORTY DAYS to reach the search area. So assuming that their best assets are already in place in port in southeastern Massachusetts, and figuring they would need at least two weeks even in an emergency to prepare, it would be eight weeks before any vessel from Woods Hole could begin searching in the southern Indian Ocean. And let's not forget that they have to find a budget for that, too.

    It's probably nothing, but I suppose some of you must have noticed that one fo the recent satellite debris sightings was just ten nautical miles from 45.00°S, 90.00°E. If you were intentionally flying into oblivion... and you decided to set an autopilot for the middle of nowhere, would you pick round numbers like that for your target? Just a random thought...

    -FER


    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=127360

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site