Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Flat Bygrave alternative configuration
    From: Robin Stuart
    Date: 2014 Jul 1, 10:30 -0700

    Hanno,

     

            Glad to hear that you are finding the Bygrave scales useful.

     

    My thinking with the negative angles on the cosine scale is as follows: When you do multiplication you line the zero pointer up against a number on the cotangent scale which you interpolate by eye. When you perform division you have to line up 2 numbers both of which are interpolated by eye. Without a cursor that you would have in a normal slide rule this can be a bit tricky to do. With the negative angles you can calculate cot(z) = cot(x) / cos(y) by lining the zero pointer on the cosine scale up against x on the cotangent scale and then looking for y in the negative side of the cosine scale.

     

    I can certainly add additional minute marks on the scales but of course that can only be done up to a certain point near the zero end of the cosine scale before things all merge together towards zero. For the flat Bygrave I found personally that having too many markings introduces a fair amount of visual confusion so I followed Gary Lapook's marking densities. It would be a simple matter to turn the cylindrical scales found at http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Postscript-code-for-making-Bygrave-Scales-Stuart-mar-2014-g27398 into flat versions and I can do that for you. Of course that would require the supplementary angles to be removed.

     

    Regarding your printing of scales on B size paper; I assume you did some printer scaling.  This will have a couple of effects that may be or may not be advantageous. The scale tick marks will be thicker and the labels will be larger than in the original. Finer scale marks presumably make for more precise readings. Also the spacing between scale cycles will increased and that would mean the area available on paper is not be used as efficiently as possible. It should be straightforward to produce a version of the scales that are optimized for B size paper and can be printed directly without scaling by the printer. Would that be of interest?

     

    Regards,

    Robin

     

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site