NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Dave Walden
Date: 2013 Mar 21, 15:18 -0700
Some time ago "a large number of beliveable simulated secenarios" showed that for the majority of cases, the normal approach is better! Go back and look.
*******************************
Come on... We've been through ALL of this before. Your arguments are un-convincing. You have no evidence, either in simulation or in real-world navigation, that your approach has any merit at all. Sorry. If you want to "peddle" this theory of yours again, I suggest you find some better way to defend it than hand-waving arguments --and, YES, that is exactly what they are right now. Prove your approach works, for example, with...
a large number of believable simulated scenarios that show persuasively that your approach for generating a running fix is ....
better than the normal approach. Until then, it's just hot air.
-FER
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
