Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Fix Maximum Probability Positions
    From: John Karl
    Date: 2013 Mar 26, 13:44 -0700


    Yes in the estimation approach, one uses all the info available PRIOR to acquiring the new, and more accurate, LOP. There's nothing wrong with ignoring currents and drift if there's no info on them, or if you simply chose to. Then the location of the EPRF along the new LOP has that uncertainty built in, as well as the normal uncertainty. But that EPRF is still the best Rfix with the data used.

    And yes, the distance between the EPRF and the TP (DR, etc.) is a measure of the component of error in the direction perpendicular to the LOP. And there's no info on error along the LOP.

    But the traditional running fix gives no error information.
    (The error is all in its assumptions.)

    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site