NavList:

----- Original Message -----

From: David Cortes

To: bpennino.ce@charter.net

Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:44 PM

Subject: [NavList] Re: Finding the true horizon

---

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

For many years I've been away from my sextant because I can't shoot stars
method of without a very difficult to use and inaccurate artificial horizon
constructed out of a mirror sitting on adjustable screws.  Your idea seems
to be quite workable.

Thanks yet again.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] On Behalf Of Frank Reed
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 4:57 PM
To: dcortes---com
Subject: [NavList] Re: Finding the true horizon

David, you wrote:
"So is this of some help to us land-locked navigators who want to practice
with our sextants without the hassle of an artificial horizon? "

It can be. If you're in a city, you can find the true horizon this way
(probably easiest to connect up the perspective lines by taking a photo).
Then, if you're lucky, you'll find that you have some horizontal feature,
like a building roof line, sufficiently far away that can serve as a
surrogate horizon, close to the true horizon that you've determined by
crossing perspective lines. If it's a little above or below the true
horizon, then you can just work out some effective dip by measuring between
them. In fact, you could also do this by direct altitude observations
treating dip as an unknown. The distance "sufficiently far" should be far
enough away so that a small change in your height of eye does not
significantly move the line. If you always take your sights while standing
and from a fixed location (e.g., always on the same floor of your home or
maybe always from your back deck), then your height of eye will surely vary
by less than six inches. A ratio of 3438-to-1 is a minute of arc, so if the
surrogate horizon line is 1700 feet away or more, then it will move by less
than a minute of arc. If it's over three miles away, then a six inch change
in height of eye would affect the location of that surrogate horizon by only
a tenth of a minute of arc.

Speaking of treating dip as an unknown, for any of you who were following
the thread about measuring dip, you can measure it with an ordinary properly
adjusted sextant as long as your goal is just collection of data for
statistical analysis (as opposed to live navigation). You measure altitudes
from a known location and clear them treating dip as unknown (set to zero).
Then the error in the sights is equal to your dip.

-FER


----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------

: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=123120

: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=123136