Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Finding great circle apex?
    From: Brad Morris
    Date: 2019 Jan 19, 12:45 -0500
    Hello David

    You wrote
    What could you use the formula for except for passing exams?

    One of the references pointed out the reason.  I saw it in passing.

    The reason you would want to know this is if your intended course would take you too close to the polar regions.  By this, I think they mean prevalence of icebergs, not particularly pack ice or the poles themselves.  Naturally, those items would be of concern, but might be readily evident from the initial GC course.  Steer your ship clear of hazards by clipping off the region of concern.

    From a practical standpoint, most of us are highly unlikely to ever have call to exercise this equation.  Perhaps Jeremy, but no doubt his vessel already has the very latest gizmo to account for this.

    Brad





    On Sat, Jan 19, 2019, 12:03 PM David Pike <NoReply_DavidPike@fer3.com wrote:

    Sean you wrote: I'm about the farthest thing from a mathematician that you can find.

    I sympathise with you.  I thought I was quite good at maths at school, but when I got to college I realised I’d only been doing ‘sums’ until then, and ‘clever maths’ was a different kettle of fish altogether.  Unless I could draw a picture to explain it, I found it a struggle.  I still do.  Even when I’ve made the effort to understand in the past to complete a project or an exam, I’m afraid I remember it for no more than about 30 minutes once I no longer need it.  I believe that’s what they say about higher education. The important thing is not to be able to remember everything you've learned, but that it teaches you how to go about finding the answer.

    I woke up thinking about your first formula,  cos(Latv) = cos(Lat1) ∙ sin(C). 

    There’s nothing wrong with just a starting point and no particular destination.  You could put in any value for a starting course you wished from 001 to 360.  All you’d get were 360 great circles.  All would have a northerly and a southerly vertex.  The one which started heading 360 would be a special case.  It would go though the poles, and the spherical triangle would be just the arc of a circle, a bit like in a Mer Pas calculation.   What could you use the formula for except for passing exams?  Well I suppose it might help you to know what cold weather gear to take with you, or if you were likely to encounter pack ice. Maybe it could be used in broadcasting or to predict satellite orbits. DaveP

    View and reply to this message

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site