NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: False Horizons
From: Nicol�s de Hilster
Date: 2007 Nov 20, 15:40 +0100
From: Nicol�s de Hilster
Date: 2007 Nov 20, 15:40 +0100
Isonomia wrote: > As a separate question to my other post, I want to use a sextant on > land to demonstrate to children that you can locate your position with > the sun. > > The obvious first problem is getting an accurate fix on the "horizon", > and the obvious answer (even without a book) was to use a reflection. > All good in theory, but in practice it is full of problems. > > 1. there is the problem of keeping a bowl of water still with kids > jumping up and down, > 2. trying to get children to stay one position long enough to keep > the reflection in view > 3. using the filters makes it even worse because they can't see the > bowl of water and the sun's reflection is quite a bit darker. > > Eventually for my younger child I tried setting up a plank in the > garden and tying the sextant up with string to give a level, but the > darn sun moved so quick that it ran off the end before I had a chance > to set it up with any accuracy. I'd appreciate any ideas! > > Perhaps making a simple quadrant would do for the kids and instead of using two visors to look through you could make one with one small open visor and a larger closed one to cast the smaller visor's shadow onto the larger (so they do not have to look at the sun). After that exercise you can explain that a sextant does a similar job using two mirrors. > Refraction errors on false horizons > > The great advantage with a false horizon for children (as opposed to > the sea), is that there is no need to pay for icecreams! AKA, taking > the children to the sea side - but more importantly there is no need > to know the size of the sun, the height of the waves, the height of > the person or anything else like that as they all cancel out. > > The great disadvantage is that you still have refraction through the > atmosphere (though not of the horizon!) and the only table I have > doesn't list refraction of the horizon separately from that of the > direct view of the sun so I would appreciate some information on this > error! > Last post on refraction in this list was NavList 3850 (check the archives at http://fer3.com/arc/sort2.aspx?y=200711md), giving three different formulae. Nicol�s --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---