Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Faint stars easier to find on the horizon first?
    From: Henry Halboth
    Date: 2004 May 28, 13:00 -0400

    Navigators customarily cross Venus with the Sun or Moon during daylight
    hours when above the horizon. Pre-comutation of altitude and azimuth
    makes this an extremely easy sight with no technical jargon necessary -
    even the lowest power telescope is usually adequate. As I have before
    posted, good star/planet sights require pre computation of altitude and
    azimuth which generally allows observations of the brighter stars and
    planets within 5 to 10 minutes before/after sunrise/sunset, depending on
    Latitude. You will never be successful in obtaining star fixes if you
    wait to see the body with the naked eye - this of course include Polaris
    which is also an extremely easy sight in the higher northern Latitudes,
    although no longer as important as it was in bygone day. The important
    point is taking these (or for that matter any) sights on the beat horizon
    possible and as twilight advances there is usually a rapid deterioration
    in the distinctness thereof.
    
    On Fri, 28 May 2004 08:55:36 +0000 "Trevor J. Kenchington"
     writes:
    > Doug Royer, extending standard technique from faint stars to the
    > brightest of planets, wrote:
    >
    > > Try this trick also on Venus as one may view Venus in early C.T.
    > when
    > > conditions are right.
    >
    > If you know just where to look, Venus can be visible to the naked
    > eye in
    > full daylight. I have only tried finding it the once but, that time,
    > I
    > did find it. Needed some concentration to keep it in sight though,
    > since
    > you have to look in exactly the right place or it disappears. (Maybe
    > it
    > needs the higher resolution of your retina's fovea to be able to
    > distinguish the small patch of brighter light from the general
    > brightness of a blue sky.)
    >
    > Why can't we use Venus to get a day-time position line? I'm guessing
    > that a sextant telescope doesn't help because its light-gathering
    > power
    > brightens the blue sky as much as the planet, meaning that it is no
    > easier to hold the image with a sextant than to view Venus with a
    > naked
    > eye, hence making the observation impractical.
    >
    >
    > Trevor Kenchington
    >
    >
    > --
    > Trevor J. Kenchington PhD                         Gadus{at}iStar.ca
    > Gadus Associates,                                 Office(902)
    > 889-9250
    > R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour,                     Fax   (902)
    > 889-9251
    > Nova Scotia  B0J 2L0, CANADA                      Home  (902)
    > 889-3555
    >
    >                      Science Serving the Fisheries
    >                       http://home.istar.ca/~gadus
    >
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site