NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: FW: millenium - 2000 or 2001?
From: Rodney Myrvaagnes
Date: 1999 Dec 28, 1:37 PM
From: Rodney Myrvaagnes
Date: 1999 Dec 28, 1:37 PM
OK, what I was pointing out is that the two (time, and what millennium you say a year is in) are completely unrelated concepts. If the NO labeled its Nautical Almanac by, say, "the Nth year of the Mth century in the Pth millennium" rather than by "1999" in the commonly accepted number system, it would matter when they thought a millennium starts. Since they don't label things that way, it matters not. If indeed a proclamation came on that subject from the NO, it is of the same consequence and legal weight as a mayor proclaiming "Tongue Consciousness Week." OTOH, it certainly matters whether it is 3:00 or 2:58 PM, if you are trying to use that nautical almanac, just as it matters whether the year starts with 1 or 2. On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 14:53:52 -0500, Craig wrote: >What I was trying to state by the example of 3:00 P.M. is: If your watch >indicates 3:00 P.M. and you think it's 3:00 P.M., but the US Naval >Observatory recognizes that same instant as being 2:58 P.M., whether they >are right or wrong, the time is 2:58 P.M. I refer to the concept that the >legal time and millennium is the time and millennium that is officially >proclaimed; if anyone disagrees they are wrong. Rodney Myrvaagnes J36 Gjoa Associate Editor Electronic Products My oyster knife is Y2K compliant