Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP's
    From: Brad Morris
    Date: 2009 May 1, 16:53 -0400

    Hi Jeremy
    The newly linked file method just worked.  Don't be so hard on yourself 
    regarding the variance in DR. S--- happens.
    Upon review of the data, it shows that you are indeed subject to the SMG 
    estimation and not to the DR position.  That really isn't a surprise.  As 
    each LOP is advanced or retarded by a function of velocity, the fix changes 
    as a function of each LOP.  The error in SMG contributes almost directly to 
    the error in fix.  The same applies to the course made good.
    The overall method works because of the least squares fit (assuming that is 
    the regression method) at the end.  This is nothing more than good old Saint 
    Hilaire.  We wouldn't try this on a plotting sheet, simply because all the 
    lines are at a relatively shallow angle.  Further, 25 LOPS with 24 advanced 
    LOPS might confuse the living heck out of me, especially when I go for the 
    "cocked hat".
    However, for a computer, it is an easy day to create the fix.  It cannot be 
    confused by the multiplicity of lines, nor will it make a plotting error in 
    advancement or retardation.  Yes, a human could perform all of this, albeit 
    at the risk of many minor errors as they go.
    For similar reasons, the Latitude by Double Altitude methods espoused by 
    Bowditch fell out of favor.  Just too easy to make a mistake, and very long 
    in computation.  This is very evident in the 4th method (variance of 
    declination permitted).  That method is twice as long as any other and 
    certainly longer than a lunar.  That makes it easy to make a mistake.  I 
    spent a very long time creating a spreadsheet to do this, simply because the 
    directions are obtuse and the cases are many.  Now that I have the method 
    programmed, it is easy to fill in the altitudes, declinations and time 
    interval.  The latitude pops out.  I would never really try this by hand, it 
    is just too cumbersome and error prone.
    The "rapid fire fix", at least for me, falls into that category.  Yes, a 
    computer can perform the calculation.  A human, not so much!
    Best Regards
    "Confidentiality and Privilege Notice
    The information transmitted by this electronic mail (and any attachments) is 
    being sent by or on behalf of Tactronics; it is intended for the exclusive 
    use of the addressee named above and may constitute information that is 
    privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If 
    you are not the addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering 
    this message to same, you are not authorized to retain, read, copy or 
    disseminate this electronic mail (or any attachments) or any part thereof. If 
    you have received this electronic mail (and any attachments) in error, please 
    call us immediately and send written confirmation that same has been deleted 
    from your system. Thank you."
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site