Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    R: Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP's
    From: Federico Rossi
    Date: 2008 Aug 9, 16:49 +0200

    Jeremy,
    you're right, what I got is only an estimated position, which is meaningless
    unless the 1900 ZT position is considered a DR position as it used to happen
    before GPS.
    I still have some navigation notes that my father took when he was an
    Italian merchant marine deck officer. They are real life celnav problems and
    if anyone is interested I would be glad to post some of them here.
    Federico
    
    -----Messaggio originale-----
    Da: NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] Per conto di
    Anabasis
    Inviato: venerd� 8 agosto 2008 22.26
    A: NavList
    Oggetto: [NavList /] Re: Exercise #14 Multi-Moon LOP's
    
    
    Frederico,
    
    Glad you worked them out.  I didn't bother posting a solution as
    such.  Basically the given 1900 ZT position is a GPS fix, so that is
    what we can assume to be the true position, and the celestial fix is
    an error check of the GPS position (please no arguements on this point
    as it is beyond the scope of this exercise.)
    
    I plugged each moonline into my celestial program (SkyMate Pro) as
    individual moon LOP's.  The computer then compared them and gave me a
    fix of 14 deg 14.9' North; Longitude 142 deg 51.9' East.  This is a
    1.7 nm error as compared to the 1900 fix via GPS.
    
    The trouble with crossing an averaged LOP in this case with a course
    line is that it does not give us a fix, but rather an "estimated
    position."
    
    This is an experiment I did to see if a fairly large number of sights
    of the same body, shot in a relatively short period of time, could
    give us a position of reasonable accuracy away from meridian transit.
    As we can see, it is fairly accurate, certainly accurate enough for a
    deep sea position.  The position probably would be more accurate if
    the azimuth of the body was greater then 5.5 degrees, but that is why
    I shot the moon, as the azimuth is changing rapidly, even away from
    the time or meridian transit.
    
    Jeremy
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site