Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Errors in USNO celestial data
    From: Paul Hirose
    Date: 2010 May 04, 14:21 -0700

    Here's my shot at the Sun's GHA at noon UT1, May 4, using ICE. First
    compute the "right answer" with the USNO MICA 2.0 program.
    
    1. Examine IERS Bulletin A at the USNO Web site. For 2010 May 4 it says
    TT-UTC = 66.184 s (that value will remain constant until the next leap
    second) and UT1-UTC is predicted to be -0.02524 s. So delta T = 66.184 -
    (-0.02524) = 66.2 s to sufficient accuracy.
    
    2. Get Greenwich apparent sidereal time from MICA. It's a function of
    UT1 only, so an error in delta T has no effect. (This is not absolutely
    true, but practically so.) Enter 12:00:00 UT1, read GAST = 2h 49m 04.5706s.
    
    3. Get the apparent true right ascension of the Sun. This is a function
    of TT only. Noon UT1 = 12:01:06.2 TT, at which time the Sun's apparent
    RA = 2h 45m 50.974s.
    
    3. Since GHA = GAST - RA, the value from the foregoing figures is 3m
    13.6s, or 48'24" GHA.
    
    4. Turning to ICE, it says 2h 49m 04.5706s is the Greenwich apparent
    sidereal time at 12:00:00 UT. (According to the documentation, the input
    time is assumed to be UT1 for sidereal time and navigation computations,
    TT in all other cases.)
    
    5. At 12:01:06 TT (= noon UT1), ICE says the Sun's apparent RA = 2h 45m
    50.973s.
    
    6. GAST - RA = 3m 13.6s = 48'24" GHA, same as MICA. The only difference
    between the programs was .001 s in RA.
    
    Both programs have inadequate time input functions. MICA allows only .1
    s precision, while in ICE it's one second. This prevents you from
    utilizing all of the available accuracy and display precision.
    
    Given ICE's coarse time steps, I was lucky to do as well as I did. It
    would have been less trouble to use the Navigation function. Simply
    enter 12:00:00 and request the Sun position. You get a direct readout of
    48.4' GHA, which agrees with the values above and the USNO online sight
    reduction tool.
    
    In theory there is a problem because ICE's delta T is 72.3 s, about 6 s
    too great. That means the Sun's RA is computed for 12:00:06, not noon.
    But the Sun moves only 1 degree per day, or .04" per second of time, so
    the delta T error is insignificant.
    
    It's helpful to remember that delta T affects sight reduction via the
    hour angle, which is the difference between apparent sidereal time and
    the right ascension of the body. Sidereal time changes 30 times faster
    than RA for the Moon, 360 times faster for the Sun, even more so for
    other bodies. So, if you're forced to choose one or the other, it's
    best to throw any time scale error into the RA computation.
    
    --
    I filter out messages with attachments or HTML.
    
    
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site