Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Equation of Time Simplified?
    From: Richard B. Langley
    Date: 2013 Mar 11, 14:29 -0300

    Interesting, deductive development.
    When it comes down to it, virtually everything in celestial mechanics can be 
    expressed using equations, albeit at times with limited precision, and/or 
    extremely long ones. Some of the equations are intuitive, some less so.
    The equation of time, E, can be written in equation form as (see Meeus, Chapter 27):
    E = L_o - 0.0057183� - alpha + deltaPsi * cos (epsilon)
    L_o = sun's mean longitude (given by planetary ephemerides; also representative by an equation)
    alpha = apparent right ascension of the sun
    deltaPsi = nutation in longitude (given by the nutation theory and a very long equation)
    epsilon = obliquity of the ecliptic (can be represented by a polynomial)
    The Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac, gives a low precision 
    version of the equation of time as
    E = -1.915� * sin(G) - 0.020� * sin (2G) + 2.466� * sin(2*lambda) - 0.053� * sin(4*lambda)
    (nicely showing the annual and seasonal variations)
    G = 357.528� + 35999.050� * T
    L = 280.460� + 36000.770� * T
    lambda = L + 1.915� * sin(G) + 0.020� * sin(2G)
    T = number of Julian centuries from J2000.
    Wikipedia also gives some expressions for computing EoT:
    -- Richard Langley
    On 2013-03-11, at 1:49 PM, George Brandenburg wrote:
    > I have always been intrigued by the Equation of Time, especially at the time 
    of year when the earliest sunset and the latest sunrise occur a couple of 
    weeks before and after the shortest day. When I took Frank's course a few 
    years ago I learned how to use the EoT and what it looked like plotted as a 
    function of time, and at some point I learned that it resulted both from the 
    elliptical shape of the earth's orbit and the tilt of the earth's axis. But I 
    had the impression that the EoT was the result of a fairly complicated 
    calculation that couldn't be written as an actual equation. And a quick look 
    through the Wikipedia entry for EoT didn't dispel this notion.
    > So recently a favorite pastime has been to try and visualize the effects 
    that lead to this time shift and how they change over the course of the year. 
    (It's actually been a great way to get to sleep after I go to bed!) I found I 
    could come up with relatively simple explanations for the two contributions 
    that only depended on basic geometry and physics. In fact the only part I 
    couldn't work out in my head was the spherical geometry needed for the axis 
    tilt effect - somehow this was never included in my education as a physicist. 
    But a quick look in Bowditch provided the necessary spherical trig formula.
    > Once I had a formulas for both effects in mind I put them into excel 
    together with a calculation of the EoT from NOAA, and I was pleased to see 
    that they agreed almost perfectly! So my next exercise was to write up what I 
    had done in case any other Cel Nav geek might be interested:-). I also 
    generated a couple of figures to help explain what I was doing. The end 
    result is attached, and yes it does conclude with a relatively simple formula 
    for the EoT.
    > If this is of interest to any NavListers I'd love to hear your comments, criticisms, etc.
    > Cheers,
    > George B
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    > Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    > To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
    > Attached File: 
    > EoT-Simplified.pdf (no preview available)
    > View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=122773
    | Richard B. Langley                            E-mail: lang---.ca         |
    | Geodetic Research Laboratory                  Web: http://www.unb.ca/GGE/ |
    | Dept. of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering    Phone:    +1 506 453-5142   |
    | University of New Brunswick                   Fax:      +1 506 453-4943   |
    | Fredericton, N.B., Canada  E3B 5A3                                        |
    |        Fredericton?  Where's that?  See: http://www.fredericton.ca/       |

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site