Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Emailing: A-meteor-storm-over-Stone-008.jpg
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2011 Feb 4, 15:53 -0000

    On 1 Feb, the following item appeared in the printed version of theGuardian
    newspaper-
     (The best places to see stars in Britain, 1 February, page 3, G2).
    Itappeared on the online version the previous day, at-
    
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/jan/31/best-stargazing-britain
    
    In the printed version of the paper, the picture was captioned "A meteor
    storm over Stonehenge", which was obviously incorrect. The printed version
    was a bit different from that shown in this online version, in that the
    comet had been cropped off it.
    
    Yesterday, the following correction appeared, in-
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2011/feb/03/corrections-clarifications
    as follows-
    • A photograph used to illustrate an article about stargazing was wrongly
    captioned as showing "a meteor storm over Stonehenge". In fact it was a
    photograph of stars taken with a long exposure which, due to the Earth's
    rotation, produces the effect of trails (The best places to see stars in
    Britain, 1 February, page 3, G2).
    
    =======================
    
    Indeed, that wasn't all that was wrong. The area around Stonehenge does not
    have particularly dark skies, and indeed a main road runs right past the
    Heel Stone, so it is hardly a good place for "watching stars". But, more
    particularly, the star background looks to me to be quite wrong, for
    somewhere as far North as Stonehenge, at 51º N. The star pattern should
    then be rotating about the South Celestial pole, a point that lies 51º
    below the horizon. It looks to me as though the star background shown in
    that picture is centred much closer than that to the horizon, perhaps only
    25º or so below it, indicating that it was taken from much nearer to the
    tropics. Am I right?
    
    To be sure, I need to identify that pattern of stars, and whether it is
    indeed that of the Southern stars, or the Northern. I'm not familiar enough
    with the stars to identify what part of the sphere is being shown here
    (with the comet behind it), but I'm sure it will be instantly recognisable
    to some Navlist members. All that's needed is to give a name to one or two
    of the stars in the picture, and the rest will follow.
    
    It seems pretty clear, to me, that this is a completely-bogus composite
    agency picture, with the stars, and independently the comet (which seems to
    show little streaking) superimposed on to the picture of Stonehenge. As it
    is against stated Guardian policy to publish such pictures, I am collecting
    evidence to show the error of their ways.
    
    George.
    
    contact George Huxtable, at  george@hux.me.uk
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    
    
    

    File:


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site