Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Eclipse of Io
    From: Herbert Prinz
    Date: 2002 Oct 6, 16:04 +0000

    Hi Mitch, and Everybody,
    
    A few hours ago, those of us who were in the right place could watch a
    nice eclipse of Io, the first moon of Jupiter. The eclipse was visible
    in North America east of ca. 120 W, in South America west of ca. 60 W,
    and from the North Pole(!). The atmosphere was beutifully clear and the
    Moon (our Moon) helped greatly by staying totally out of the way.
    
    I observed with a 12" Newtonian reflector, 1m focal length and a 7mm
    occular.
    
    At 09:46:05 UT I first became aware of the fading of Io. Also in the
    field of view happened to be an unnamed star of mag.8, against which I
    could compare Io. (Io is mag. 4.8 ) Of course, you can always compare
    the eclipsing moon against the other ones, but they are all about the
    sime brightness, so it is much more obvious when you can watch how Io
    starts ought significantly brighter and ends up fainter than a nearby
    star.
    
    At 09:47:46 Io had about the same app. magnitude as the comparison star.
    
    At 09:48:37 things got exciting when Io had become a tiny point that was
    about to disappear any second. But it still took another 50 seconds to
    09:49:25 until Io was finally gone. This is the amazing thing, that it
    takes so long for that last dot to disappear. Now I am used to it, but
    in the beginning I would get really tense, trying to look so long fully
    concentrated, afraid to blink.
    
    According to the IMC ephemeris, entrance into penumbra was at 09:45:47
    UT, exterior contact with umbra at 09:46:30 and interior contact at
    09:50:05.
    
    One really can't expect to notice much during the penumbral phase of the
    event. I am not sure how meaningfull my first observation of fadingis.
    Of the time it takes from ext. to int. contact, a third had passed when
    I noticed the decrease of app. magn of Io from 4.8 to 8. Finally, I was
    40 seconds early with my observation of disappearance. (should be
    interior contact, but in practice never is). This fits well with my
    previous experience. Sometimes  I am a minute early.  I reckon 40s is my
    telescope correction in very good weather and a minute in not so good
    weather.I am also that much late on reappearances, sometimes even more
    as they are harder to observe.
    
    Herbert
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site