Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Ebay kollsman periscope sextants
    From: Paul Dolkas
    Date: 2018 Jun 6, 18:00 -0700

    David-

     

    The A-12 had a different type of light path than the Kollsman – you don’t view the star through the cell (see attached).  Rather than using a mirror to reflect the light up into the cell from below,  you could use a prism to bend it down to view the cell from above. Placing the lamp behind the cell would give you a dark circle against a bright background. So it could be done.

     

    But you’re right about the effect of dust or any other contamination. Maybe a better idea than a solid BB would be a drop of mercury inside an oil filled cell. Depending on the viscosity of the oil, you could get some nice damping against vibration without it being too “slow”. You wouldn’t have to worry about the fluid eventually evaporating either.

     

    One of the other reasons I chose the pendulum in my project was that you don’t have to be limited to a circle for the reference. I would much prefer the Kollsman’s combination of a line or reticle pattern and a circle to the Link’s bubble.

     

    -Paul Dolkas

     

    From: NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] On Behalf Of David Pike
    Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2018 12:46 PM
    To: paul{at}dolkas.net
    Subject: [NavList] Re: Ebay kollsman periscope sextants

     

    Maybe a better design solution would have been to use an inverted chamber with an appropriately sized ball bearing on the bottom, rather than a bubble on top.  Paul Dolkas

    A fewslight problems here Paul.  Normally, you require a transparent bubble, so you can see stars through it.  No light will travel though a ball bearing (bb).


    Then you’d still need a collimating lens to focus the bb at infinity like the Sun and stars.

    After that, the radius of the ball dish would have to equal the focal length of the collimating lens, so the Sun & bb kept in line without the need for fiduciary marks when the sextant was tilted in the direction of viewing.  Therefore, the dish would be very shallow.  Could you get a bb smooth enough to move freely on such a shallow dish?  A spot of dust and oops!  I’ve no doubt there’d be other problems as the experts will no doubt tell us.

    With a pendulous reference sextant the graticule is frequently on a transparent disc dangling on a quartz thread suspended in a suitable fluid.  It amazes me how you can lay them on their side occasionally without damaging them (well maybe that’s why my index errors keeps changing!). DaveP

    View and reply to this message

    File:


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site