NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Dreisonstok Compliments Weems
From: Greg Rudzinski
Date: 2009 Dec 14, 13:43 -0800
From: Greg Rudzinski
Date: 2009 Dec 14, 13:43 -0800
I would like to add this rule for all bodies : A. If Latitude and declination are the same in name use Dreisonstok. B. If Latitude and declination are contrary in name use Weems. This will keep things positive. On Dec 14, 12:50�pm, Greg Rudzinskiwrote: > In the process of comparing short methods of non electronic sight > reduction it came to my attention that the subtle differences between > Dreisonstok and Weems tables actually compliment each other very well > thus making it worth while having both copies at hand. The beauty of > having both lies in the treatment of declination as a plus or minus. > What I like to do is add instead of subtract where ever possible so by > using Weems in the northern hemisphere fall/winter and Dreisonstok in > the northern hemisphere spring/summer addition of declination is > maintained. The other beautiful compliment is the graph vs. tabular > azimuth determination. When speed is needed then the Weems graph is > used. When accuracy for compass error determination is needed then > Dreisonstok is used. Once an Hc is determined by Weems then extracting > Z' and Z" from Dreisonstok is simple. -- NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList+@fer3.com