NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Re Re: Dream Choice of Sextant
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2005 Aug 12, 17:12 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2005 Aug 12, 17:12 -0500
Jared, I did not understand from this exchange, what exactly is the advantage of titanium as a material for a sextant frame. I understand its advantages as a material for eyeglass frame: it is stronger than steel of the same weight. But what can happen to a sextant frame, why should it be so terribly strong? You are not going to drop your dream sextant on a concrete floor. And even if you do, it is much likely that you destroy the mirrors and the telescope, but not the frame. Simply speaking, don't you think that a brass or aluminium frame of modern sextants is already strong enough? Alex. On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Jared Sherman wrote: > Until the breakup of the USSR most titanium was terribly expensive. > IIRC they controlled the largest production sources? And it was > considered a strategic defense resource by all parties. Now, it is > simply > expensive--and still terribly expensive to work. If the properties are > right it might make a dream sextant but the kind we'd only see offered > in the Nieman Marcus Christmas Catalog.