Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Dream Choice of Sextant
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2005 Aug 8, 02:17 -0500

    Dear Mike,
    I've never heard of a C&P "Pelarus" sextant.
    Maybe you mean C&P Polaris?
    (A "star specialist" as they call it)
    
    I have a very limited experience with
    C&P sextants (once Fred Hebard let me try his,
    and recently I visited their factory where I had an
    opportunity to try them all from the window of their office).
    And I have to say that NONE of their sextants
    is my "dream sextant":-)
    In particular I was disappointed with all
    these gimmicks like astigmatizer,
    Schueler prism, and fancy horizon glasses.
    
    I strongly prefer to have a variety of scopes
    and eyepieces instead, an eyepiece filter
    and a simple "traditional" horizon mirror,
    which is most light-efficient of all of them.
    
    Alex.
    
    On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Mike Hannibal wrote:
    
    > If you had a choice between a C&P Horizon Ultra and a
    > C&P Pelorus which would you choose? Money isn't the
    > issue.
    >
    > The use is the full breadth of uses to which you might
    > put a sextant with an equal balance between
    > star/planet sights, sun sights and coastal nav stuff -
    > distance off, horizontal bearing etc.
    >
    > For those unfamiliar the key differences between the
    > two instruments are:
    >
    > 1) both use the same frame and "running gear";
    >
    > 2) the Horizon Ultra has a whole horizon mirror,
    > polarisers in both sets of shade glasses and
    > Schueler's double prism to get verticality right. In
    > other words it's a specialist sun machine;
    >
    > 3) the Pelorus has standard shades, an astigmatiser
    > for stars and planets, and an unusual horizon mirror
    > that is about 70% silvered in the a centre vertical
    > strip and unsilvered on either side. It is designed to
    > be very effective with dim stars but still OK brighter
    > objects.
    >
    > I guess my current thinking is that the polarisers are
    > nice and make sun brightness and horizon clarity very
    > easy to get just right but that the Polaris is
    > proabably better for stars as it isn't hampered by the
    > known issues of a whole horizon mirror. On balance
    > what I want is the Pelorus with the polarisers as
    > well. I expect that verticality of the instrument will
    > not be an issue when using the astigmatiser but that
    > you'll just have to rock like you always do when doing
    > sun/moon.
    >
    > Love to hear your views, and particularly if anyone
    > has used the Polaris or the Horizon Ultra.
    >
    > Regards
    >
    > Pelorus
    >
    > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
    >
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site