Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Double Altitudes: Prelude to Sumner's line?
    From: Fred Hebard
    Date: 2005 Feb 28, 07:34 -0500

    On Feb 28, 2005, at 6:34 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
    
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >>> on 2/11/05 7:22 AM, Jim Thompson at jim2{at}JIMTHOMPSON.NET wrote:
    >>> Sumner opens his Introduction with this glorious single-sentence
    > paragraph:
    >>> "It is not so much the object of this work to present the navigator
    >>> with
    > a new method of 'Double Latitudes', as to afford him an accurate
    > method of
    > finding, by one Altitude of the Sun taken at any hour of the day, with
    > the
    > Chronometer time, the True Bearing of the Land, the Latitude, &c.,
    > being,
    > from any cause, uncertain; and to place him on his guard, when near a
    > dangerous coast..."
    >
    > On re-reading this paragraph, I think that I need to understand the
    > significance of his phrase, "Double Latitudes".  If calculating a
    > second
    > solution for a sight based on an assumed latitude was well known
    > practice by
    > 1837 for other purposes, then that would have been the building block
    > that
    > allowed Sumner to creatively apply the technique to his problem, and
    > thus
    > allow him to stumble on the celestial line of position concept when he
    > found
    > himself off Small's Light.  I do not understand the concept of "Double
    > Latitudes", however, so I might have that all wrong.  I tried a google
    > search, but turned up nothing on that technique.  I found lots on
    > "double
    > altitude", but not "double latitude".  Does anyone wish to explain the
    > concept?
    >
    > Jim Thompson
    >
    >
    
    Sumner didn't use St. Hilaire's method, assuming one location and then
    finding a line of position based on azimuth and distance from that
    position.  Rather, he assumed two latitudes and found the longitudes
    corresponding to those latitudes.  Then fitted a line of position
    through those two locations.
    
    Having the assumed latitude plus the sight, he determined longitude.
    Assuming a second latitude gave him a second longitude, with the same
    sight data.
    
    Fred
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site