Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Distance off with Chicago buildings
    From: Bill B
    Date: 2005 Oct 6, 19:40 -0500

    Bill wrote:
    "As to distance by height, I have  done many trials with Chicago buildings,
    and the Michigan City (Indiana)  light house, cooling tower and smokestack
    with an Astra IIIB. I was amazed  at my very poor results, using Bowditch
    tables or trig. I won't discount my  technique, but results were often 30%
    off our DR/GPS position. "
    
    Frank Replied:
    I have a hunch I know what the problem is here. The bases of those buildings
    are usually well below the horizon unless you're within just a few miles of
    shore. I did some beach sights last week as follows (corrected for IC):
    Sears Tower  Altitude: 30.8'
    Hancock Tower Altitude: 22.1'
    Hancock-Sears Separation: 3d  7' (antennas aligned)
    Michigan City Cooling Tower: 10.7'
    
    The  approximate heights of these in feet are: Sears 1450, Hancock 1127,
    Cooling  Tower 361. Since my horizon was 4 or 5 miles away, the lower parts
    of all of  these buildings were below the horizon, something like 8 minutes
    of arc for the two Chicago towers were hidden below the horizon. So instead
    of using the altitudes directly, use their difference: 8.7 minutes of arc.
    
    Frank
    
    Good to have you back.
    
    My figures for the Chicago skyline heights seem to match yours. Not clear my
    lat/lon are on the money. 361' is the number I have for the Michigan City
    cooling tower, but have not been able to get a hard number for their smoke
    stack (they believe it is between 450 and 480 feet).
    
    Buildings North to South
    Height: Ground to Roof
    John Hancock    1,127 ft.
    41 53.9       87 37.4
    Prudential Plaza   995
    41 53.1   87 37.4
    AON Center   1,136
    41 53.1   87 37.3
    Sears Tower   1,454
    41 52.7   87.38.1
    311 S. Wacker (big light)
    41 52.7   87 38.2
    
    Hancock: Rush & Pearson
    Prudential: E Lake & Michigan
    AON: 220 E Randolph
    Sears: W Adams & S Wacker
    311 S Wacker: Same
    McCormick: 2301 S Lakeshore
    Berghoff: 17 W Adams
    312-427-3170
    
    I was able to locate a topo map on the web for the Michigan City area, and
    it looks like the ground at the cooling tower is about 20 feet above water
    level.  For Chicago (since it was a land fill and operates on two levels) I
    used a guestimate of 30 feet above lake water level.  In all cases I added
    this to the the height of structure from ground to roof top to estimate
    height above lake level.
    
    I do believe that were it not for obstructions, I could see the base of the
    building from the four-mile-crib area and a bit beyond.  Height of eye 8 ft,
    base 30 ft above water level, hence visible for approx. 8 nautical miles.
    
    So far, so good.  But then things fall apart.  The structures above are a
    bit inland, and in most cases the bases of the structures cannot be seen
    from the water due to obstructions.  The other big problem is the inner and
    outer breakwaters which obscure the view of the shoreline.  Therefore I was
    using a "horizon" formed by objects a significant distance from the
    structures and toward me.  Too many variables I had not accounted for.
    
    I have had some moderate success using angles of separation between the
    Sears and Hancock from approx. 6-8 nm away.  Used the sextant for
    separation, and a hockey-puck compass for a bearing corrected to true for
    Sears.  Of course the angles were high single to low double digits, and
    there is just so close a compass will come, so not exactly the best
    procedure.  Came within .5 nm of known position, so nothing to write home
    about.  Might be fun to try Sears, AON and Hancock with a three-arm
    protractor.
    
    I do have much better luck measuring from the roof tops to a clean horizon,
    and on an extremely clear day heading back to Michigan City, or over to St
    Joe, estimating distance from Chicago by watching building tops of known
    height slowly drop below the horizon.  Can't recall the exact number, but
    there are approx. 9 buildings poking above the horizon when viewed from
    Michigan City.
    
    Which brings me to the question of height on charts of lighthouses etc.  Not
    much in the way of tides on the Great Lakes, although lake level can
    fluctuate several feet over time. When the a structure's height (lighthouse
    etc) is given on a chart, what is the starting point?  Mean low water level
    for sea, base, etc?  And is the height to the top of the structure or to the
    light?  How does the mariner using height above an observable shoreline or
    height above the horizon when the base is below the horizon determine the
    actual height above water level of the structure?
    
    Thanks
    
    Bill
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site