NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Discussion of subs/INS
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2012 Apr 12, 14:04 -0400
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2012 Apr 12, 14:04 -0400
Alex, I agree that Cel Nav was used to check/update the INS units. I believe the frequency might have been as low as once every 14 days. If you read the descriptions of the units the U.S. Navy used in the links I provided, they probably exceeded what is available publicly today. They also had four units, not a single unit. Fred Hebard On Apr 12, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Alexandre E Eremenko wrote: > > Greg, > Thanks for this interesting piece of evidence: > >> the extremely stringent standard required for launching nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles after being submerged for long periods without position updates from offboard sources. The WSN-7 and WSN-7A RLG-based systems require updates from the global positioning system (GPS) every 14 days." > > Given that a modern system (which is for sale now; I gave a link in > one previous message) does 1nm/day, and assuming that the performance > of the INS is > the same, we conclude that the "extremely stringent standard" > is about 14 miles:-) > > Which is quite possible, because MODERN ballistic missiles do not > rely solely on INS, but use Cel Nav (like space stations), a sensor > which catches stars and possibly planets and/or sun by its sensor. > But this sort of Cel Nav is probably out of the list scope anyway:-) > > It still seems to me that Cel Nav was the most accurate and universally > available method for checking INS until the satellite era. > > Alex. > > > >