NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Discussion of subs/INS
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2012 Apr 12, 20:11 -0400
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2012 Apr 12, 20:11 -0400
Frank, Thanks for this message with so much relevant info. > There's a book by Donald Mackenzie, written in 1993, "Inventing > Accuracy: > A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance" (portions available The title sounds very promising. Today I checked in my library the book "Soviet Military Policy", which contains the paper "The Soviet Union and strategic missile guidance" by Donald MacKenzie:-) The book is partially available on Internet but this paper is not. > Celestial through the periscope. I would like to see one of those periscopes:-) > There are some big problems with this process which may not have been > discussed yet. One problem I see immediately is that the waves will obscure the horizon if the periscope is not tall enough. If it is tall enough, one will need a dip-meter:-) in the same periscope, for high accuracy:-) On a small boat even very moderate waves frequently obscure the horizon (from my own experience). > But the really huge problem is the Earth's gravity field. In 1970-s I worked as a researcher in a Soviet research institute. (In Physics). And even did something about search and detection of American submarines, hope Byron will forgive me:-) It looked to me in 1970-s that almost every physicist and mathematician in Soviet Union was somehow involved with search of submarines:-) I did not really have access to any secrets, and had no security clearing, but I saw a list of the kinds of research data which were restricted for publication, and had to undergo censorship. The list itself was secret:-) N 1 in the list was "All research of the Earth gravity field in the Arctic". Publications in this area were "totally prohiboted". Alex.