NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Discussion of subs/INS
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2012 Apr 12, 14:35 -0400
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2012 Apr 12, 14:35 -0400
Dear Fred, Few remarks. 14 days before a missile launch does not seem enough for advertised accuracy of these missiles. On a routine voyage this can be enough. > they probably exceeded what is available publicly today. What do you mean "publicly". The item to which I posted the link is advertised as a INS for BALLISTIC MISSILES SUBMARINES. To you think there are many "in the public" who own those? :-) > They also had four units, not a single unit. Like with chronometers, this does not help with accuracy. This only helps you to tell that the units show wrong data. These units do not go off because of some fault in the unit, but because the error accumulates. It accumulates in all of them, and averaging will not help here. To me the most plausible scenario is that the checks were more frequent and NOT by Cel Nav. Cel Nav depends much on weather, after all. I am inclined to think that the possible launch places were marked somehow with a kind of sound beacons in the bottom. This looks like the most reasonable solution to me, short of satellites, but I have no direct evidence. Satellites can be used by tethered or disposable receivers on the surface, which send a sound signal to the sub, and then sink if necessary. Alex.