Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Dipmeter: was [NAV-L] Wires, back sights and collimation
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2004 Dec 1, 14:58 +0000

    Alex Eremenko wrote, referring to my use of a modified sextant as dipmeter-
    
    >On the other hand, this argument does not apply to the
    >periscope device which George made.
    >(Contrary toi what I said in my first message on this
    >topic). Because with this
    >device,
    >the sextant index error can be found in the usual
    >way. The only question is how one adjusts the mirrors
    >or the prisms of the telescope itself.
    >They need two checks if I understand correctly:
    >a) that the angle between the mirrors is exactly 90 degrees,
    >and
    >b) that both poeriscope mirrors are perpendicular to the frame.
    >But this is the question to George, how he does this.
    
    I'm sorry, but I don't have a precise analytical answer to give to Alex.
    
    The best I can do is to explain as follows-
    
    The backward-looking periscope was as-bought, part of some obsolete
    military sighting equipment, at a guess. From the robust way it is
    constructed, the angle between the two mirrors should indeed be very
    stable. But whether it's exactly 90 degrees, so that light would be
    reflected right back on itself, I have no idea, and have made no attempts
    to check it (and wouldn't know how to).
    
    I suggest that any discrepancy from exactly 180 degrees reversal would be
    compensated for in the subtraction of the measurement process, in which the
    instrument is used normal way up and inverted. Comments from others would
    be welcome.
    
    As for the mounting of the periscope on the sextant, I don't think it
    matters a damn, really. If it was tilted, keeping in the plane of the
    sextant (i.e. in a "nodding" direction) then it would still reflect light
    through EXACTLY the same angle of (nominally) 180 degrees. It could even be
    mounted on an upper extension to the index arm, and it would still work.
    Tilting it slightly out of the plane implies no more than looking at a bit
    of the horizon behind your head, that's a bit displaced to one side or
    another of the azimuth opposite to the forward view. But the horizon is
    uninterestingly flat, so I don't think there would be anything but a
    second-order error. Again, comments welcome.
    
    ==================
    
    Such a prism or backwards-periscope has a useful application of its own,
    when parted from the sextant, as Blish pointed out. Say you want to keep to
    a transit, shown by a line between two posts or landmarks. It's easy to
    line them up, before you have reached them. But if you wish to keep to a
    track when BETWEEN two such landmarks, when one is ahead and one astern
    (which Blash called an "inner transit"), how do you do it? This comes up
    often in harbour pilotage, where you might well invent your own useful
    transit line between two marks on opposite sides of the harbour, in shallow
    water with narrow channels such as my home harbour at Poole.
    
    Most of us find we can do such a trick by looking ahead and astern, and
    guessing when the marks are about 180 degrees apart. But with a Blish prism
    or periscope you can do it precisely! Hold the prism horizontally, so that
    when looking into it you see a view behind, past your ear. Hold it up so
    that over the top of it you see one of the marks, and then in the prism
    view you should see an image of the other, if the directions are anywhere
    near opposite. Now you just have to steer so that those images line up with
    each other, and you are exactly on the line between them. Simple as that.
    It works!
    
    George.
    
    ================================================================
    contact George Huxtable by email at george---.u-net.com, by phone at
    01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
    Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ================================================================
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site