NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Dip-meter again
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2012 Apr 10, 11:32 -0400
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2012 Apr 10, 11:32 -0400
The Americans may have had satellite nav then; the Transit series of satellites. I believe they had to know where they were. On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Alexandre E Eremenko wrote: > > Fred, > >> Just as a side note, one reason the Soviets may have >> been more interested in dip than others is that anomalous dip is more common in the Arctic (and Antarctic). > > And I assume you have to know the position of your submarine > very exactly, to be able to hit your target with an ICBM :-) > Perhaps this was the reason why Schufeldt report was classified? > > Alex. > > P.S. I am not sure about early submarine ICBM, but once I visited > an old Minuteman silo in Wyoming (it is open for the public). I was surprised that the missile > was unguided. It was aimed only at the start by a sophisticated aiming > arrangement, involving a hudge graduated ring... For this you need to know your launching position > very exactly. > > > >