NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Dip
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2004 Dec 1, 14:59 +0000
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2004 Dec 1, 14:59 +0000
Alex wrote- >From what I read, error in the dip due to refraction >is usually much less less than 1', that is not totally >negligible but small. Response from George- Yes, that USUALLY is the case. But occasionally, the dip is significantly greater, as in Blish's own report of observations off Southern California, and you have no way of knowing that it's so. So, presumably, the prudent navigator has to allow for a possible error in his observations up to the maximun possible (or likely) value of anomalous dip, whatever he considers that might be. Unless he has a dipmeter to check it, he is working in the dark, as far as dip is concerned. He can null out the effects of anomalous dip by taking a round of star-sights at dusk that include stars at many different azimuths, or, better, star-pairs in nearly opposite directions. Referring to Schufeldt's refraction corrections, Alex mentions- >He uses some Russian tables of refraction for such altitudes >published in Moscow in 1930. Yes, the astronomers at Pulkova Observatory (near Leningrad, I think) took a special interest in refraction, and there has been a series of publications on the topic from Pulkova over many years. They have long been regarded as the authorities on this matter. The most recent reference I've found (in Seidelmann's "Explanatory Supplement") is to "Refraction Tables of Pulkova Observatory, 4th ed.", (Academy of Sciences Press, Moscow, Leningrad), 1956, though I haven't seen this publication. >He says that he took 380 sights at such altitudes, and with very >careful correction of the sights (including water and air temperature >and other meteorological info, irradiation etc.) his position >line was never mostly within 2 miles of his true position. But Alex has to accept that no matter how good are tables of mean refraction and any meteorological corrections, the evidence of his own eyes showing distortions in a low-level Sun-disc proves that occasionally refraction can deviate locally and substantially from any predictions. George. ================================================================ contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by phone at 01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. ================================================================