NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Dip Anomaly
From: Robert Eno
Date: 2008 Mar 13, 21:21 -0400
From: Robert Eno
Date: 2008 Mar 13, 21:21 -0400
I used a marine sextant bubble attachment on
Chesapeake Bay for a similar purpose. In my case, I was trying to calibrate the
bubble attachment using the known dip correction for my height above sea level.
I still have the raw data in my logbook.
I do, however, agree with Peter that bubble
sextants and bubble attachments are generally not precise enough to confidently
determine dip anomalies, however, I believe it can, on occasion and with careful
observation, be done.
cheers
Robert
----- Original Message -----From: Peter FoggTo: NavList@fer3.comSent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 6:50 PMSubject: [NavList 4666] Re: Dip AnomalyGreg Rudzinski asks:
"Can a bubble sextant be used to measure dip
anomalies from a known height of eye?"The proposition implies using both a conventional and bubble sextant consecutively and comparing the results.I guess one problem is that bubble sextants do not tend to give particularly precise results. They are also notoriously difficult to use (to hold level) on-board.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---