Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Dip Angles from Blue Hill Observatory
    From: Paul Hirose
    Date: 2013 Apr 03, 20:22 -0700

    Bruce J. Pennino wrote:
    > On April 1, 2013 I went to Blue Hill Observatory near Boston. It is easy to 
    reach and has(had) a National Geodetic Survey Station (Bench Mark BM) on the 
    top of the mountain. I was told there is a clear view to the horizon over 
    Massachusetts Bay to the NE. The BM PID MY 3472 is covered by an 18 " 
    concrete base for a flag pole.
    
    Too bad the mark itself could not be found, as the station has a long
    history. Possibly the copper bolt that marks the station is original
    from 1845.
    
    http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/ds2.prl?retrieval_type=by_pid&PID=MY3472
    
    Now, about the height. Apparently it wasn't measured very accurately.
    If you search for PID MY3472 (Blue Hill) at the NGS site, the list of
    search hits shows a 1 in the H column (meaning first order horizontal
    station) and blank in the V column. So they don't consider the mark a
    vertical control station. The height determination was incidental to the
    horizontal survey. In this case, the height was computed by adjusting an
    old NGVD 29 vertical datum height, which in turn came from vertical
    angle observations.
    
    C&GS vertical angle procedure was to record six pointings, reversing
    face each time. "It is desirable that these observations be made between
    12:00 noon and 4:00 P.M. since refraction is smaller and more constant
    during that part of the day." Each L/R pair was meaned to yield three
    determinations of zenith distance free of index error. If all three
    agreed within 10 seconds, the observation was complete. Such angles
    would have been observed both ways between Blue Hill and the other
    adjacent stations in the triangulation chain. A tie to a bench mark was
    desirable about every third quadrilateral in the chain.
    
    In other words, vertical angle height determinations at triangulation
    stations were a far cry from geodetic leveling.
    
    Nevertheless, is the height good enough for your purposes? If I had to
    guess, I'd say yes. Just don't think of it as a gold plated value.
    
    If you're really serious, maybe you could rent a GIS data collection GPS
    receiver. (The purchase price would be in the range of a quality
    sextant.) My old Magellan Promark X is repeatable to 1.0 meter RMS
    vertical with a 3 minute observation.
    
    By the way, I know only one way to create an URL like the one above:
    save one in your browser to serve as a prototype. Viewing a datasheet at
    the NGS site doesn't give a usable URL. However, the PID, which is shown
    at the beginning of each line, can be copied and pasted into a prototype
    URL in the obvious place.
    
    --
    I filter out messages with attachments or HTML.
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site