NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Digital Image CN Exercise #3
From: Marcel Tschudin
Date: 2010 Apr 11, 13:07 +0300
From: Marcel Tschudin
Date: 2010 Apr 11, 13:07 +0300
Greg, Thank you for this exercise. I had in mind to ask you for one with the sun at a high altitude in order to see what can be achieved with more predictable refraction. Proceeding with your data, I get the following coordinates for the photographer: Using LL: 34.194933 N, -119.246715 (W) Using UL: 34.195451 N, -119.246592 (W) I proceeded then with the mean of the two locations, with an Azimuth Sun = 36.77653 (counted from South) However, looking at the NOAA chart doesn't show a light house in this area. (Or, did I miss it?) I proceeded then with the island. The cliff and the lowest edge of Anacapa Island is 0.9059375 deg further in West direction, having an azimuth of 37.6824675 deg (from South). A line in this direction crosses the West Anacapa Island. This would mean that the Middle and East Islands would be hidden behind the horizon; this however would mean that the height of the hidden islands wouldn't exceed about 30m (about 100ft). Looking at them with Google Earth gives me the impression that they are likely to be higher. As a check I drew a parallel line from the eastern etch of the Anapaca Islands and this passes close to your assumed location. So, what went wrong? In the mean time I did indeed do some modifications to the program but the checks I performed indicated that it seemed to work again correct. If the information of my program is correct you changed in CA to summer time on 4 April. Could it be that you missed this when converting local time to UTC? I attach a screen shot showing your assumed location as "Pt LL 0", the mean location as "Loc mean" and the mentioned azimuth lines to the Anacapa Islands. Marcel