NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Digital Camera Celestial Navigation
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2008 Jul 09, 09:10 -0700
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2008 Jul 09, 09:10 -0700
Marcel Tschudin wrote: > Paul wrote: > "With a body of 16' semidiameter, and sea level refraction, this > decreases the semidiameter about .27". I tested this at several > altitudes from 10 degrees to 80, and it didn't vary more than .01[sec > arc]". > I couldn't figure out how you obtained this value. Looking at it > geometrically by linear interpolation: about 0.5 deg refraction at the > horizon and 0 refraction in zenith direction results in a much larger > value. Looking at it using differential refraction shouldn't result in > a more or less constant value (0.27"). I would appreciate if you could > explain the cause of the effect in more detail. Your values are the vertical refraction. My message was about the decrease in *horizontal* semidiameter due to refraction. -- I block messages that contain attachments or HTML. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---