Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Different (?) vernier
    From: UNK
    Date: 2020 Dec 20, 05:10 -0800

    I think you’re correct. I leaped before thinking it all the way through.
    This - adding the right side of the vernier (0-10) up to the half way past a degree mark on the arc and then, after the halfway point on the arc, adding the left side of the vernier (10-20) until you get to the next degree mark on the arc is nicer. No subtracting.

    So, why?

    In spite of the eBay seller’s unproven claim of “the 1700’s”I’ll consider that the maker of this octant knew about the normal vernier scale and was trying to accomplish something else.
    I wondered if he, or she, was trying to cover 90 degrees without having to accommodate the vernier to the left of zero. But- he, or she, has added 5 degrees to both ends of the arc so no net gain of space.
    I like David’s idea that the maker had already made a mark and didn’t want to start over. I can imagine a 1700’s “Arrrgh!” from the workbench.
    Looking cool is always a good reason too.

    Any opinions on “the 1700’s” claim?
    Regards, Noell

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site