# NavList:

## A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
 Add Images & Files Posting Code: Name: Email:
Re: Datum for Nautical Almanac
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2004 Oct 30, 13:45 +0100

```Michael Dorl made this further enquiry below, about the basis of the
Nautical Almanac's predictions-

I will answer his further questionas as well as I can, but am not an
astronomer or any sort of pundit on such matters.

>I understand that declination is independent of the reference spheroid
>provided the spin axes agree.
>
>are the following statements concerning the NA true?
>
>   Decl and GHA/SHA are with respect to earth's mean equator and equinox.

Yes, that's my understanding.

>   Diurnal; aberrations effects are not included.

Correct. An observer riding round with the Earth in equatorial regions is
travelling at something like twice the speed of a commercial jet-plane, say
800 miles in an hour. This is a tiny fraction of the speed of light, which
is 186,000 miles in a SECOND. The tan of the angle of DAILY aberration is
given by the ratio between the two speeds: therefore the diurnal aberration
is no greater than 0.3 arc-seconds, so is rightly neglected in the almanac.
Even if it happened to be much greater, the effect would still have been
excluded, because it depends on the observer's position: there's no such
effect at the poles, for example. So the almanac would have left it to the
observer to correct for himself. Being completely negligibe, the question
doesn't arise.

==============

>   Diurnal parallax effects are included based a spherical earth of (I

No, they are excluded, because they depend on the position of the observer.
They are left for the observer to allow for, depending on the altitude, but
information is provided to assist. The horizontal parallax is given for
Moon and Sun, and it's included in the altitude corrections for some
planets.

The predictions are based on a spherical Earth of equatorial radius 6378
kilometres. For the Moon only, this may not be sufficiently accurate. It
may need correcting for the shape of the Earth, so an extra small
correction, "Augmentation of the Moon's parallax" can be made, which
depends on the observer's latitude.

===============

>The suppositions concerning diurnal effects are made since the NA contains
>no corrections based on position;  the NA corrections depend
>only on observed altitude.

Ah. But the observed altitude depends greatly on the observer's position,
doesn't it?

George.

================================================================
contact George Huxtable by email at george---.u-net.com, by phone at
01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
================================================================

```
Browse Files

Drop Files

### Join NavList

 Name: (please, no nicknames or handles) Email:
 Do you want to receive all group messages by email? Yes No
You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

### Posting Code

Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
 Email:

### Email Settings

 Posting Code:

### Custom Index

 Subject: Author: Start date: (yyyymm dd) End date: (yyyymm dd)