Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Datum for Nautical Almanac
    From: Herbert Prinz
    Date: 2004 Oct 30, 04:40 -0400

    Michael Dorl wrote:
    > are the following statements concerning the NA true?
    >    Decl and GHA/SHA are with respect to earth's mean equator and equinox.
    It has to be equator and equinox of date, because this is what you are able to
    >    Diurnal; aberrations effects are not included.
    >    Diurnal parallax effects are included based a spherical earth of (I
    > don't know radius).
    I would think it is the equatorial radius, but the N.A. doesn't say. In an
    astronomical almanac, this is what I would expect. But we should not take it
    for granted. In nautical almanacs, there is all sorts of fudging going on with
    semidiameters, parallaxe, etc. The Connaissance des temps at the end of the
    18th cy used the radius through Paris, but by the mid 19th cy they had
    switched to the equatorial radius. Consequently, they called it then by its
    correct name "Equatorial horizontal parallaxe". The difference between the
    Equ.H.P. and the HP at the pole is 11". So, it does matter within the nominal
    accuracy of the N.A.
    Herbert Prinz

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site