NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Date Line and Kiribati
From: Jim Thompson
Date: 2005 Mar 10, 15:26 -0400
From: Jim Thompson
Date: 2005 Mar 10, 15:26 -0400
> -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Reed > Where should one draw the lines? Does it make any > difference? Should the date line be the simplest, shortest line > that separates islands and land masses with differing date > standards? If I'm a cartographer, can I draw the line anywhere I > want (with due respect for tradition so I don't annoy potential > customers)? Is there any practical circumstance where the > arbitrariness of the date line might eventually cause problems?? Frank, I dug into IDL history and tradition a fair bit last year, when I was working on http://jimthompson.net/boating/CelestialNav/DatesTimeDiagrams.htm and http://jimthompson.net/boating/CelestialNav/CelestNotes/Time.htm As I understand it, the IDL and in fact all time zone boundaries are not mandated by any international law. So land communities can set their own legislation to define where they draw their time zone boundaries, and define which time zone they lie in. Hence there are many zig-zags and odd pockets of local time variances from the basic concept of even longitude boundaries every 15 degrees. These boundaries change so frequently around the world that keeping a map perfectly up to date is very difficult. Conversely early in the 20th century an international convention was struck whereby ships at sea were to honour the "Nautical" Date Line, which follows the 180d longitude without zig-zagging. One consequence of this is that they used Time Zone Y in celestial navigation solutions. I don't think any land community lies in Time Zone Y -- perhaps Eniwetok. I don't know if this was what you were looking for. Jim Thompson