Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: The Darn Old Cocked Hat - the sequel 1
    From: Hanno Ix
    Date: 2013 Mar 14, 13:19 -0700

    A little stung by your comparison CelNav to shooting I repeated the
    procedure shown in my 'memos' with data from gun shots.

    One of the attachment is - supposedly - a copy of the drawing on 
    pg 3-20 of the doc FM6-60 that Gary posted yesterday.
    I have digitized the  impacts  as good as I could. (1. attachmt)

    The 2nd attachment shows a histogram of the distances from 
    Impact to Mean Point of Impact calculated from the impact data.

    The data is imperfect since points near the axis' were excluded in FM 6-40
    perhaps for graphical reasons. However both, horizontal and vertical coordinates, 
    have each a distributions as close to a Gaussian as could be expected from this very raw data.
    There is a twist: both possess different std variations as compared to the symmetrical 
    CelNav Case of my memos.

    Nevertheless, I think the histogram  fits acceptably a Rayleigh Distribution 
    and compares well with those of  CelNav fixes. An MLE yielded a rather 
    reasonably tight estimation of the parameter B. as shown by the
    annotated data.

    Therefore I have reason to believe that CelNav and shootings exhibit 
    rather similar statistcal behavior.


    From: Geoffrey Kolbe <geoffreykolbe---.com>
    To: hannoix---.net
    Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:46 PM
    Subject: [NavList] Re: The Darn Old Cocked Hat - the sequel 1

    At 06:39 14/03/2013, you wrote:

    I don't see how you get the hole in the center of your graphic. Look at the table of probabilities versus standard deviation.

    The problem is that Hanno's plots show probability as a function of radius, not probability density as a function of radius. The former is essentially the latter multiplied by the radius, (2*pi*r*dr) which is why there is a hole in the centre of Hanno's graphics. When r = 0, the area is zero and the probability is zero. But this does not mean the probability density is zero.... and that is what John Karl was plotting on his graphics.

    Geoffrey Kolbe
    View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=122859



    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site