Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Cylindrical Slide Rule tube poll
    From: Gary LaPook
    Date: 2010 Jan 22, 21:32 -0800

    Here are some links to photos of the Bygrave that I took in London and 
    previously posted:
    
    
    http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/IMG_2095.JPG
    http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/Copy-of-IMG_2100.JPG
    http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/IMG_2097.JPG
    http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/IMG_2098.JPG
    
    You can see the scales have a butt joint.
    
    I had written before that the Bygave cotangent scale went up to 89� 45' 
    but the picture shows it only goes to 89� 40' which may no seem like a 
    big difference but it takes an additional spiral to go that extra 5'.
    
    gl
    
    
    
    Richard M. Pisko wrote:
    > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:57:16 -0700,  
    > wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> The 'problem' is not parallax as the eye can look perpendicularly 
    >> onto the scales  on the tubes quite accurately; it is the difference 
    >> in scale lengths with different diameters of tube which I would 
    >> consider a potential problem.
    >
    > I believe the sheet of paper wrapped around the innermost cylinder may 
    > be scaled smaller in one direction.  That way, the cut edge will meet 
    > the proper spiral exactly along a longitudinal butt joint (actually, I 
    > overlapped the join onto a quarter inch of blank space) while having 
    > the length untouched so as to match the outer scale.
    >
    >> Theoretically they should be exactly the same scale factors and hence 
    >> same length wrapped around helically.
    >
    > Yes, that would be true if the paper and tubes were infinitely thin.
    >
    >> Different diameters necessarily means there will be slightly 
    >> different scale lengths if printed with the same scale factor.
    >
    > Yes, and so the scale factor in one direction will be changed to match 
    > the diameter of each tube.  The scale factor in the other direction 
    > should be the same on both tubes.
    >
    >> I have not worked out the errors introduced with a real Bygrave SR, 
    >> (I'm not sure of the exact diameters involved and the scale lengths 
    >> themselves)  but assume it cannot be too great or it would be 
    >> noticeable and would have been reported by now.
    >
    > I think a little bit of trial and error in printing will give 
    > acceptable results.  If the spiral segment ends match up on each 
    > cylinder to within 0.01 inches, I doubt any of the calculation results 
    > would differ.  Since the real Bygrave has outside diameters of the 
    > tubes that differ by perhaps ten times that amount (say a tenth of an 
    > inch), the paper scale must have been reduced or enlarged in one 
    > direction accordingly; otherwise there would have been an overlap or 
    > gap of the printed part by about a third of an inch.
    >
    
    
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site