Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Custom Polaris Table SHA / Dec 2020-2030
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2019 Oct 22, 09:13 -0700

    Greg, you wrote:
    "You are correct that a tenth of a minute precision in Polaris SHA is not necessary."

    This is a recurring problem with Polaris tables. Even the tables in the almanacs typically quote the SHA of Polaris to the nearest minute of arc. This is simply nuts. A degree is good enough, as Geoffrey has said, and if you want a little more (as a safety digit) then give the SHA of Polaris to the nearest tenth of a degree (at 89.6° Declination, 0.1° in SHA is better than a tenth of a minute in SHA at the equator).

    "A tenth of a minute precision in declination is justified I would think."

    As much as it is anywhere else in celestial navigation, yes (which is to say, it's generally over-kill, but we can count it as a safety digit to reduce round-off error).

    Frank Reed

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site