
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Currents & Streams, was: DR thread from Nov-Dec '04
From: Jared Sherman
Date: 2005 Jan 24, 14:17 -0500
From: Jared Sherman
Date: 2005 Jan 24, 14:17 -0500
<> < > Pedants in Canada and other places may say tidal stream, but as Bowditch, NOS, and NOAA all accept and use the term "tidal current" within the US, and I'm a Damned Colonial in the US, the correct pedantic term *here* is "tidal current". Remember, the value in a name is to identify the person using it--not simply the object being named. Torch, fag, tube, valve, underground...Why shouldn't our natuical terms reflect their user, too? < > Using the correct technical term is useful only among technicians. Here, you will hear boaters, fishermen, and even Coasties (USCG) use both terms interchangeably. Lacking the Academie Francaise, we Colonists actually do determine propriety by common usage. Give the dictionaries a decade or two, and the common usage becomes the definition they move up to number one. I don't mind the rest of the world seeing things in different terms, after all, US and Canadian bouyage and navigation marks are "backwards" versus the rest of the world. Yet somehow they continue to suffice for their purposes.