Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Cosine vs haversine formulas
    From: Robert VanderPol II
    Date: 2017 Nov 18, 20:33 -0800

    Thanks Frank, the link gave me half of the root answer I was looking for but did explicitly spell out which was why was the haversine formula developed in the first place and does it still have an advantage:

    Historical aside: The height of technology for navigator's calculations used to be log tables. As there is no (real) log of a negative number, the 'versine' enabled them to keep trig functions in positive numbers. Also, the sin2(θ/2) form of the haversine avoided addition (which entailed an anti-log lookup, the addition, and a log lookup). Printed tables for the haversine/inverse-haversine (and its logarithm, to aid multiplications) saved navigators from squaring sines, computing square roots, etc - arduous and error-prone activities.

    It seems like it still has an advantage over the cosine formula if you are doing things manually, but other manual methods have things to recommend depending on where your priorities are for speed, accuracy, space considerations and error proneness.

    It sound like computationally the cosine formula is now the way to go.



    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site